123 Street, NYC, US 0123456789 [email protected]

ljseaifkw

Rate of human-wildlife conflict in India has researchers making urgent appeals for solutions

first_imgArticle published by Mike Gaworecki Animals, Conservation, Environment, Environmental Policy, Human-wildlife Conflict, Wildlife, Wildlife Conservation Between 2011 and 2014, Dr. Krithi Karanth, a conservation scientist with the Wildlife Conservation Society, and Sahila Kudalkar, a research associate with the Centre for Wildlife Studies, surveyed 5,196 families from 2,855 villages adjacent to 11 different wildlife reserves in western, central, and southern India.The researchers found that 71 percent of households surveyed have lost crops to wild animals, 17 percent have lost livestock, and three percent have had human injury or death result from a run-in with wildlife.Tallying these losses and understanding the methods used to mitigate the impacts of human-wildlife conflict is crucial to designing better policies to deal with the problem, Karanth and Kudalkar write in the study. Researchers in India are calling for measures to improve human-wildlife conflict management across the country after a study revealed the frequency with which clashes between animals and people are resulting in property damage, injury, and even death.Human-wildlife conflicts are typically the result of growing human populations encroaching ever-further into established wildlife territory. Once they find themselves competing directly with humans for dwindling resources, wild animals are known to raid the crop fields or livestock pens kept by humans, resulting in confrontations that can have severe negative consequences for people and animals alike. Between 2011 and 2014, Dr. Krithi Karanth, a conservation scientist with the Wildlife Conservation Society, and Sahila Kudalkar, a research associate with the Centre for Wildlife Studies, led a team that surveyed 5,196 families from 2,855 villages adjacent to 11 different wildlife reserves in western, central, and southern India. The researchers wanted to examine how frequently those families experience conflicts with wildlife and how they go about mitigating the impacts of those confrontations.“Combined with high poverty, and low awareness regarding government compensation, such families may be most vulnerable to impacts of wildlife damage upon their livelihoods,” Kudalkar said in a statement. She and Karanth have detailed their findings in a study published in the journal Human Dimensions of Wildlife this week.The researchers found that 71 percent of households surveyed have lost crops to wild animals, 17 percent have lost livestock, and three percent have had human injury or death result from a run-in with wildlife. Average crop losses amount to 12,559 Indian rupees (about $194) every year per family, while livestock losses totaled an average of 2,883 Indian rupees (about $44).These losses do not represent an insignificant portion of India’s rural economy, the researchers note, given that the majority of the population has a monthly income of less than 5,000 Indian rupees (about $77).In order to protect their crops, livestock, and other property, these rural families employ about a dozen different mitigation techniques, Karanth and Kudalkar found, with night watches, scare devices, and fences being the most commonly reported. But some households are more proactive in deploying these tactics than others. The researchers found that families with a history of livestock loss going back more than 20 years or experience with losing crops going back 10 to 20 years were, understandably, more likely to use mitigation measures, for instance.Families near reserves in Karnataka and Madhya Pradesh, states with high incidence of human-wildlife conflicts resulting in property damage and states that also happen to provide the highest levels of compensation payments in all of India, were most likely to use mitigation techniques. Families in Rajasthan, by contrast, were the least likely to employ measures to protect their crops and property.Tallying these losses and understanding the methods used to mitigate the impacts of human-wildlife conflict is crucial to designing better policies to deal with the problem, Karanth and Kudalkar write in the study: “Investments in conflict mitigation should consider the history, location, species, socioeconomic variations among households, and differences in regional policies.”But, according to Karanth, there may be better ways to address the problem than simply seeking to mitigate its impacts. She and Kudalkar are calling for more effective prevention techniques to be identified, existing compensation schemes to be strengthened, and greater dialogue between local communities, governments, and conservationists in the interest of improving India’s human-wildlife conflict management programs.“Resolving human-wildlife conflict requires revisiting the goals of conservation policies and investments by people and organizations,” she said. “This is especially true with respect to effort and money deployed associated with mitigation and protection. People may be better served by deploying early warning, compensation and insurance programs rather than by focusing heavily on mitigation.”Crop damage caused by wildlife. Photo by Krithi Karanth.CITATIONKaranth, K. K., & Kudalkar, S. (2017). History, Location, and Species Matter: Insights for Human–Wildlife Conflict Mitigation From India. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1-16. doi:10.1080/10871209.2017.1334106center_img Popular in the CommunitySponsoredSponsoredOrangutan found tortured and decapitated prompts Indonesia probeEMGIES17 Jan, 2018We will never know the full extent of what this poor Orangutan went through before he died, the same must be done to this evil perpetrator(s) they don’t deserve the air that they breathe this has truly upset me and I wonder for the future for these wonderful creatures. So called ‘Mankind’ has a lot to answer for we are the only ones ruining this world I prefer animals to humans any day of the week.What makes community ecotourism succeed? In Madagascar, location, location, locationScissors1dOther countries should also learn and try to incorporateWhy you should care about the current wave of mass extinctions (commentary)Processor1 DecAfter all, there is no infinite anything in the whole galaxy!Infinite stupidity, right here on earth.The wildlife trade threatens people and animals alike (commentary)Anchor3dUnfortunately I feel The Chinese have no compassion for any living animal. They are a cruel country that as we knowneatbeverything that moves and do not humanily kill these poor animals and insects. They have no health and safety on their markets and they then contract these diseases. Maybe its karma maybe they should look at the way they live and stop using animals for all there so called remedies. DisgustingConservationists welcome China’s wildlife trade banThobolo27 JanChina has consistently been the worlds worst, “ Face of Evil “ in regards our planets flora and fauna survival. In some ways, this is nature trying to fight back. This ban is great, but the rest of the world just cannot allow it to be temporary, because history has demonstrated that once this coronavirus passes, they will in all likelihood, simply revert to been the planets worst Ecco Terrorists. Let’s simply not allow this to happen! How and why they have been able to degrade this planets iconic species, rape the planets rivers, oceans and forests, with apparent impunity, is just mind boggling! Please no more.Probing rural poachers in Africa: Why do they poach?Carrot3dOne day I feel like animals will be more scarce, and I agree with one of my friends, they said that poaching will take over the world, but I also hope notUpset about Amazon fires last year? Focus on deforestation this year (commentary)Bullhorn4dLies and more leisSponsoredSponsoredCoke is again the biggest culprit behind plastic waste in the PhilippinesGrapes7 NovOnce again the article blames companies for the actions of individuals. It is individuals that buy these products, it is individuals that dispose of them improperly. If we want to change it, we have to change, not just create bad guys to blame.Brazilian response to Bolsonaro policies and Amazon fires growsCar4 SepThank you for this excellent report. I feel overwhelmed by the ecocidal intent of the Bolsonaro government in the name of ‘developing’ their ‘God-given’ resources.U.S. allocates first of $30M in grants for forest conservation in SumatraPlanet4dcarrot hella thick ;)Melting Arctic sea ice may be altering winds, weather at equator: studyleftylarry30 JanThe Arctic sea ice seems to be recovering this winter as per the last 10-12 years, good news.Malaysia has the world’s highest deforestation rate, reveals Google forest mapBone27 Sep, 2018Who you’re trying to fool with selective data revelation?You can’t hide the truth if you show historical deforestation for all countries, especially in Europe from 1800s to this day. WorldBank has a good wholesome data on this.Mass tree planting along India’s Cauvery River has scientists worriedSurendra Nekkanti23 JanHi Mongabay. Good effort trying to be objective in this article. I would like to give a constructive feedback which could help in clearing things up.1. It is mentioned that planting trees in village common lands will have negative affects socially and ecologically. There is no need to even have to agree or disagree with it, because, you also mentioned the fact that Cauvery Calling aims to plant trees only in the private lands of the farmers. So, plantation in the common lands doesn’t come into the picture.2.I don’t see that the ecologists are totally against this project, but just they they have some concerns, mainly in terms of what species of trees will be planted. And because there was no direct communication between the ecologists and Isha Foundation, it was not possible for them to address the concerns. As you seem to have spoken with an Isha spokesperson, if you could connect the concerned parties, it would be great, because I see that the ecologists are genuinely interested in making sure things are done the right way.May we all come together and make things happen.Rare Amazon bush dogs caught on camera in BoliviaCarrot1 Feba very good iniciative to be fallowed by the ranchers all overSponsoredlast_img

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Comments